How large was the Roman army at it's peak? : r/AskHistorians
Nov 24, 2014 · The roman army was comprised of 33 legions in 200AD. In 30BC, Augustus formed his legions into nine "cohorts" of 480 men, one "double strength" cohort of 800 men (the first cohort) and a cavalry squadron of 128. Therefore there were around 5,248 men in a theoretical legion, including various officers. On paper there were 173,184 men in the ...
What would be the modern day equivalents of roman military ranks?
Apr 10, 2015 · Tribunes: (depending on experience & political ranking) - Major to Lt. Colonel. Legion Legatus: Brig. General. Imperial Legatus (Imperator): General. Don't forget that it's difficult to compare modern day military rankings with Roman legion rankings because modern day military officers do not hold political office while in service.
Were the ancient Roman armies more effective than medieval
The Roman army of Trajan would have crushed any medieval army, for one basic reason: the Roman army, unlike the levies and knights called together by medieval kings, was a professional fighting force. Its armies had training and - more importantly - financial and logistical resources that no medieval state could match.
Did Roman legions actually march 20 miles a day? : …
Nov 9, 2020 · Vegetius claims Roman recruits should be trained to march 20 Roman miles (30km) a day in roughly six hours at the ordinary step, and 24 miles (35.5 km) at a full step. Many histories of a more or less popular character take this as a standard marching pace for Roman armies, and Stanford Orbis uses 30km as a typical military march and 60km as a ...
What is the strongest army the Romans ever put in the field?
Ceasers army that fought the Gauls, then went on to fight Pompey, the Ptolemys, and Pontus had to have been some of the best, most deadly legionaries rome had ever put into the field. Caesars Legionaries were absolute work horses. Definitely one of the deadliest and most productive legions in Roman history.
When did the myth that "Roman soldiers were paid in salt ... - Reddit
Oct 21, 2020 · In the Roman army an allowance of salt was made to officers and men, from which in imperial times this salarium was converted into an allowance of money for salt. Both versions of the myth in one place! The 1911 edition of the Britannica, for reference, includes the bit about 'Abyssinia' but omits any mention of Roman soldiers.
How was the Roman army paid? : r/history - Reddit
Ideally Roman subs would have an army paid in salt bot given how often it comes up. TIL early Americans were paid in carbohydrate-based food products. Wage-earners were called "Breadwinners" and their currency was called "Dough". They also used motivational phrases such as "Get that bread!".
Is this an accurate display of ranks in the Roman army?
Jun 6, 2021 · If you are Interested in this stuff you should get the Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Uniforms of the Roman world by Kevin kiley. That might be just what you are looking for. Some of the stuff in this pic is pretty oversimplified and in accurate. No, this is way oversimplified and skips a lot of ranks specific roles within ranks.
How truly effective were Roman soldiers/legions against ... - Reddit
Jan 23, 2014 · The allied states even revolted in the 1st C BCE to gain Roman citizenship not to break free. This meant their available manpower was much larger and they could drown their opponents in new armies. I think Hannibal probably had a moment when a 4th Roman army showed up instead of a peace treaty after Cannae.
Did Roman soldiers actually get paid in salt? : r/AskHistorians
May 27, 2013 · Consider The Complete Roman Army (Goldsworthy) or The Roman Republic (Crawford). The former is more didactic, the latter a bit more terse. The former is more didactic, the latter a bit more terse. The Marian reforms transformed the Roman legions from a volunteer-landowner force during times of war to a standing army.